Does God Rapture Animals Because He Also Took Animals In The Days Of Noah

The Bible gives united states of america a framework for explaining dinosaurs in terms of thousands of years of history, including the mystery of when they lived and what happened to them.

Dinosaurs are used more than near anything else to indoctrinate children and adults in the idea of millions of years of earth history. However, the Bible gives the states a framework for explaining dinosaurs in terms of thousands of years of history, including the mystery of when they lived and what happened to them. Ii cardinal texts are Genesis 1:24–25 and Task 40:15–24.

Are Dinosaurs a Mystery?

Many recollect that the being of dinosaurs and their demise is shrouded in such mystery that nosotros may never know the truth most where they came from, when they lived, and what happened to them. Nonetheless, dinosaurs are only a mystery if y'all take the evolutionary story of their history.

According to evolutionists: Dinosaurs first evolved around 235 million years agone, long before man evolved.one No homo always lived with dinosaurs. Their history is recorded in the fossil layers on earth, which were deposited over millions of years. They were so successful as a group of animals that they eventually ruled the earth. However, around 65 million years ago, something happened to change all of this—the dinosaurs disappeared. Virtually evolutionists believe some sort of cataclysmic event, such as an asteroid bear upon, killed them. But many evolutionists claim that some dinosaurs evolved into birds, and thus they are not extinct but are flight around united states of america even today.2

There is no mystery surrounding dinosaurs if you accept the Bible'due south totally different account of dinosaur history.

According to the Bible: Dinosaurs first existed around half-dozen,000 years ago.3 God fabricated the dinosaurs, along with the other land animals, on Solar day vi of the Creation Week (Genesis 1:20–25, 31). Adam and Eve were also made on Day 6—so dinosaurs lived at the aforementioned time as people, not separated by eons of time.

Dinosaurs could non have died out before people appeared because dinosaurs had not previously existed; and death, bloodshed, disease, and suffering are a result of Adam'southward sin (Genesis one:29–xxx; Romans 5:12, 14; 1 Corinthians 15:21–22).

Representatives of all the kinds of air-breathing state animals, including the dinosaur kinds, went aboard Noah's Ark. All those left outside the Ark died in the cataclysmic circumstances of the Flood, and many of their remains became fossils.

After the Flood, around iv,300 years agone, the remnant of the land animals, including dinosaurs, came off the Ark and lived in the nowadays globe, along with people. Because of sin, the judgments of the Curse and the Flood have greatly changed earth. Post-Flood climatic change, lack of food, disease, and man'due south activities caused many types of animals to become extinct. The dinosaurs, like many other creatures, died out. Why the big mystery about dinosaurs?

Why Such Unlike Views?

How tin there be such totally dissimilar explanations for dinosaurs? Whether 1 is an evolutionist or accepts the Bible's account of history, the evidence for dinosaurs is the aforementioned. All scientists have the aforementioned facts—they have the same world, the same fossils, the same living creatures, the aforementioned universe.

If the "facts" are the same, then how can the explanations be so different? The reason is that scientists accept simply the present—dinosaur fossils exist only in the present—but scientists are trying to connect the fossils in the nowadays to the past. They ask, "What happened in history to bring dinosaurs into beingness, wipe them out, and leave many of them fossilized?"4

The scientific discipline that addresses such issues is known every bit historical or origins science, and it differs from the operational science that gives us computers, inexpensive food, space exploration, electricity, and the like. Origins science deals with the past, which is not attainable to direct experimentation, whereas operational scientific discipline deals with how the world works in the here and at present, which, of course, is open up to repeatable experiments. Because of difficulties in reconstructing the past, those who study fossils (paleontologists) have diverse views on dinosaurs.5 As has been said, "Paleontology (the written report of fossils) is much like politics: passions run high, and it'due south easy to draw very different conclusions from the aforementioned set up of facts."half dozen

A paleontologist who believes the tape in the Bible, which claims to be the Word of God,seven will come to different conclusions than an atheist who rejects the Bible. Willful denial of God's Discussion (ii Peter 3:3–7) lies at the root of many disputes over historical science.

Many people think the Bible is merely a book well-nigh religion or salvation. It is much more than this. The Bible is the History Volume of the Universe and tells us the future destiny of the universe besides. Information technology gives us an account of when time began, the main events of history, such as the entrance of sin and death into the world, the time when the whole surface of the earth was destroyed by water, the giving of different languages at the Tower of Babel, the account of the Son of God coming as a human, His death and Resurrection, and the new heavens and globe to come up.

Ultimately, there are only 2 means of thinking: starting with the revelation from God (the Bible) equally foundational to all thinking (including biology, history, and geology), resulting in a Christian worldview; or starting with human being's beliefs (for instance, the evolutionary story) as foundational to all thinking, resulting in a secular worldview.

Almost Christians take been indoctrinated through the media and education system to think in a secular way. They tend to take secular thinking to the Bible, instead of using the Bible to build their thinking (Romans 12:1–2; Ephesians iv:20–24).

The Bible says, "The fear of the Lord is the first of cognition" (Proverbs 1:7) and "the fright of the Lord is the showtime of wisdom" (Proverbs ix:10).

If one begins with an evolutionary view of history (for which there were no witnesses or written record), and then this way of thinking will exist used to explain the testify that exists in the present. Thus, nosotros have the evolutionary caption for dinosaurs above.

But if 1 begins with the biblical view of history from the written tape of an eyewitness (God) to all events of history, then a totally different way of thinking, based on this, volition be used to explain the same evidence. Thus, nosotros accept the biblical caption given above.

Dinosaur History

Fossil bones of dinosaurs are establish around the world. Many of these finds consist of just fragments of bones, simply some nearly consummate skeletons take been constitute. Scientists accept been able to draw many different types of dinosaurs based on distinctive characteristics, such equally the structure of the skull and limbs.8

Where Did Dinosaurs Come From?

The Bible tells us that God created different kinds of land animals on Day 6 of Creation Week (Genesis 1:24–25). Because dinosaurs were state animals, this must have included the dinosaur kinds.9

Evolutionists merits that dinosaurs evolved from some reptile that had originally evolved from amphibians. But they cannot indicate to whatsoever clear transitional (in-between) forms to substantiate their argument. Dinosaur family trees in evolutionary books show many distinct types of dinosaurs, only only hypothetical lines join them upward to some common ancestor. The lines are dotted because there is no fossil testify. Evolutionists simply cannot testify their belief in a nondinosaur ancestor for dinosaurs.

What Did Dinosaurs Wait Like?

Scientists more often than not practise not dig upwards a dinosaur with all its flesh intact. Even if they found all the bones, they still would take less than 40 percent of the animal to work out what it originally looked like. The bones do not tell the color of the animal, for example, although some fossils of skin impressions have been found, indicating the skin texture. As there is some diversity of color among reptiles living today, dinosaurs may have varied greatly in colour, peel texture, and and then on.

When reconstructing dinosaurs from bony remains, scientists make all kinds of guesses and oft disagree.

When reconstructing dinosaurs from bony remains, scientists make all kinds of guesses and often disagree. For example, debate has raged well-nigh whether dinosaurs were warm- or cold-blooded. It is even difficult to tell whether a dinosaur was male person or female from its bones. In that location is much speculation about such things.

Sometimes scientists brand mistakes in their reconstructions, which need correction when more than bones are establish. For instance, the original "discoverer" of Brontosaurus put the wrong head on a skeleton of this dinosaur.10

Who Discovered Dinosaurs?

Secular books would tell you that the kickoff discovery of what subsequently were called dinosaurs was in 1677 when Dr. Robert Plot found bones and so big they were idea to belong to a giant elephant or a giant human.11

In 1822, Mary Anne Mantell went for a walk along a country road in Sussex, England. According to tradition, she constitute a stone that glittered in the sunlight and showed it to her fossil-collecting hubby. Dr. Mantell, a dr., noticed that the rock independent a tooth similar to, but much larger than, that of modern reptiles. He concluded that it belonged to some extinct behemothic plant-eating reptile with teeth like an iguana. In 1825 he named the owner of the tooth Iguanodon (iguana tooth). It was Dr. Mantell who began to popularize the "age of reptiles."12

From a biblical perspective, however, the time of the above discoveries was actually the time when dinosaurs were rediscovered. Adam discovered dinosaurs when he beginning observed them.

When Did Dinosaurs Live?

Evolutionists claim dinosaurs lived millions of years agone. But it is important to realize that when they dig up a dinosaur bone information technology does not accept a label attached showing its date. Evolutionists obtain their dates by indirect dating methods that other scientists question, and there is much evidence against the millions of years.xiii

Does God tell us when He fabricated Tyrannosaurus male monarch? Many would say no. Only the Bible states that God made all things in six normal days. He made the country animals, including dinosaurs, on Day 6 (Genesis 1:24–25), so they date from effectually 6,000 years ago—the guess engagement of cosmos obtained by adding upward the years in the Bible.xiv So, since T. male monarch was a land animal and God fabricated all the land animals on Day 6, so God made T. rex (or the original Tyrannosaurid kind) on Twenty-four hour period 6.

Furthermore, from the Bible we meet that there was no decease, bloodshed, disease, or suffering earlier sin.fifteen If one approaches Genesis to Revelation consistently, interpreting Scripture with Scripture, then death and mortality of homo and animals came into the world but after Adam sinned. The first death of an creature occurred when God shed an animal'due south blood in the Garden of Eden and clothed Adam and Eve (Genesis 3:21). This was also a motion-picture show of the Atonement—foreshadowing Christ's blood that was to be shed for us. Thus, there could not have been basic of expressionless animals before sin—this would undermine the gospel.

This means that the dinosaurs must take died after sin entered the globe, non before. Dinosaur bones could not exist millions of years quondam because Adam lived only thousands of years agone.

Does the Bible Mention Dinosaurs?

If people saw dinosaurs, you would think that ancient historical writings, such every bit the Bible, should mention them. The Rex James Version was first translated in 1611.16 Some people call up that because the word "dinosaur" is not found in this or other translations, the Bible does not mention dinosaurs.

Information technology was non until 1841, however, that the give-and-take "dinosaur" was invented.17 Sir Richard Owen, a famous British anatomist and offset superintendent of the British Museum (and a staunch anti-Darwinist), on viewing the bones of Iguanodon and Megalosaurus, realized these represented a unique group of reptiles that had not yet been classified. He coined the term "dinosaur" from Greek words meaning "terrible lizard."18

Thus, 1 would not expect to find the discussion "dinosaur" in the King James Bible—the word did not exist when the translation was done.

Is there another word for "dinosaur"? In that location are dragon legends from effectually the earth. Many dragon descriptions fit the characteristics of specific dinosaurs. Could these actually be accounts of encounters with what we now telephone call dinosaurs?

Just equally Alluvion legends are based on a existent global Flood (Flood of Noah)— dragon legends are possibly based on bodily encounters with existent animals that today we phone call dinosaurs. Many of these land-dragon descriptions do fit with what we know well-nigh dinosaurs.

In Genesis ane:21 (NAS), the Bible says, "And God created the peachy sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarmed, later their kind." The Hebrew word here for "sea monsters" ("whales" in KJV) is the word translated elsewhere equally "dragon" (Hebrew: tannin). So, in the first chapter of the first book of the Bible, God may be describing the great body of water dragons (sea-dwelling, dinosaur-type animals) that He created.

At that place are other Bible passages most dragons that lived in the sea: "the dragons in the waters" (Psalm 74:13 KJV), "and he shall slay the dragon that is in the ocean" (Isaiah 27:1 KJV). Though the word "dinosaur" strictly refers to animals that lived on the country, the body of water reptiles and flying reptiles are often grouped with the dinosaurs. The ocean dragons could have included dinosaur-type animals such as the Mosasaurus.19

Job 41 describes a dandy animal that lived in the sea, Leviathan, that even breathed fire. This "dragon" may have been something like the mighty 40 ft. (12 m) Sarcosuchus imperator (Super Croc),20 or the 82 ft. (25 m) Liopleurodon.

There is besides mention of a flying serpent in the Bible: the "fiery flight serpent" (Isaiah 30:six). This could be a reference to i of the pterodactyls, which are popularly thought of as flying dinosaurs, such as the Pteranodon, Rhamphorhynchus, or Ornithocheirus.21

Not long after the Flood, God was showing a human being called Job how groovy He was as Creator, by reminding Task of the largest state creature He had fabricated:

Look now at the behemoth, which I made along with you; he eats grass similar an ox. See at present, his strength is in his hips, and his power is in his breadbasket muscles. He moves his tail like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are tightly knit. His bones are like beams of bronze, his ribs similar bars of iron. He is the start of the means of God; only He who made him can bring near His sword (Job 40:15–19 NKJV).

The phrase "commencement of the ways of God" suggests this was the largest land fauna God had made. And so what kind of brute was "behemoth"?

Bible translators, not existence sure what this creature was, often transliterated the Hebrew, and thus the word behemoth (e.g., KJV, NKJV, NASB, NIV). However, in many Bible commentaries and Bible footnotes, "behemoth" is said to be "possibly the hippopotamus or elephant."22 Some Bible versions actually translate "behemoth" this fashion.23 Besides the fact that the elephant and hippo were not the largest country animals God made (some of the dinosaurs far eclipsed these), this clarification does not brand sense, since the tail of behemoth is compared to the large cedar tree (verse 17).

Now an elephant's tiny tail (or a hippo'southward tail that looks like a flap of skin) is quite unlike a cedar tree. Clearly, the elephant and the hippo could not maybe exist "behemoth."

No living creature comes close to this description. Nonetheless, behemoth is very much similar Brachiosaurus, one of the large dinosaurs.

Are At that place Other Ancient Records of Dinosaurs?

In the moving-picture show The Bully Dinosaur Mystery,24 a number of dragon accounts are presented:

• A Sumerian story dating back to 2000 BC or before tells of a hero named Gilgamesh, who, when he went to vicious cedars in a remote forest, encountered a huge savage dragon that he slew, cutting off its caput as a trophy.
• When Alexander the Groovy (c. 330 BC) and his soldiers marched into India, they plant that the Indians worshipped huge hissing reptiles that they kept in caves.
• Red china is renowned for its dragon stories, and dragons are prominent on Chinese pottery, embroidery, and carvings.
• England and several other cultures retain the story of St. George, who slew a dragon that lived in a cave.
• There is the story of a tenth-century Irishman who wrote of his run across with what appears to take been a Stegosaurus.
• In the 1500s, a European scientific book, Historia Animalium, listed several living animals that we would telephone call dinosaurs. A well-known naturalist of the time, Ulysses Aldrovandus, recorded an encounter between a peasant named Baptista and a dragon whose description fits that of the pocket-sized dinosaur Tanystropheus. The come across was on May 13, 1572, near Bologna in Italia, and the peasant killed the dragon.

Petroglyphs (drawings carved on rock) of dinosaur-like creatures have also been plant.25

In summary, people downward through the ages have been very familiar with dragons. The descriptions of these animals fit with what nosotros know virtually dinosaurs. The Bible mentions such creatures, even ones that lived in the body of water and flew in the air. There is a tremendous corporeality of other historical testify that such creatures accept lived beside people.

What Do the Bones Say?

In that location is also physical evidence that dinosaur bones are not millions of years old. Scientists from Montana Country University plant T. male monarch bones that were non totally fossilized. Sections of the bones were similar fresh os and independent what seems to exist blood cells and hemoglobin. If these bones actually were tens of millions of years erstwhile, then the blood cells and hemoglobin would have totally disintegrated.26 Likewise, there should not be "fresh" bones if they were really millions of years old.27 A report by these scientists stated the following:

A thin slice of T. rex bone glowed amber beneath the lens of my microscope . . . . The lab filled with murmurs of amazement, for I had focused on something inside the vessels that none of us had ever noticed earlier: tiny round objects, translucent carmine with a dark center . . . . Scarlet blood cells? The shape and location suggested them, but blood cells are mostly water and couldn't possibly have stayed preserved in the 65-1000000-year-old tyrannosaur . . . . The os sample that had united states so excited came from a beautiful, nearly complete specimen of Tyrannosaurus king unearthed in 1990 . . . . When the squad brought the dinosaur into the lab, we noticed that some parts deep within the long bone of the leg had non completely fossilized . . . . So far, nosotros recollect that all of this evidence supports the notion that our slices of T. rex could contain preserved heme and hemoglobin fragments. Just more piece of work needs to be done earlier nosotros are confident enough to come up right out and say, "Yes, this T. rex has blood compounds left in its tissues."28

Unfossilized duck-billed dinosaur bones have been found on the North Gradient in Alaska.29 Too, cosmos scientists collected such (unfossilized) frozen dinosaur bones in Alaska.30 Evolutionists would not say that these bones had stayed frozen for the many millions of years since these dinosaurs supposedly died out (according to evolutionary theory). Notwithstanding the bones could not have survived for the millions of years unmineralized. This is a puzzle to those who believe in an "historic period of dinosaurs" millions of years ago, merely not to someone who builds his thinking on the Bible.

What Did Dinosaurs Eat and How Did They Carry?

Movies like Jurassic Park and The Lost World portray most dinosaurs as aggressive meat-eaters. Just the mere presence of sharp teeth does not tell you how an brute behaved or necessarily what nutrient it ate—merely what kind of teeth information technology had (for ripping food and the like). Nonetheless, by studying fossil dinosaur dung (coprolite), scientists have been able to make up one's mind the diet of some dinosaurs.31

Originally, earlier sin, all animals, including the dinosaurs, were vegetarian. Genesis 1:30 states, "And to every beast of the world, and to every bird of the air, and to every thing that creeps upon the world, which has life, I have given every green herb for nutrient: and it was so."

This means that even T. king, earlier sin entered the world, ate only plants. Some people object to this past pointing to the big teeth that a large T. king had, insisting they must have been used for attacking animals. However, just because an animal has big, sharp teeth does not mean it eats meat. It just means it has big, sharp teeth!32

Many animals today have sharp teeth merely are basically vegetarian.

Many animals today accept precipitous teeth simply are basically vegetarian. The giant panda has sharp teeth similar a meat-eater's, merely it eats bamboo. Perhaps the panda'due south teeth were beautifully designed to swallow bamboo. To explain why a behemothic panda has teeth like a meat-eaters today, all the same eats bamboo, evolutionists accept to say that the giant panda evolved as a meat-eater, and then switched to bamboo.33

Different species of bats variously eat fruit, nectar, insects, small animals, and blood, but their teeth practice not clearly betoken what they eat.34 Bears have teeth with carnivore features, but some bears are vegetarian, and many, if not nearly, are mainly vegetarian.

Before sin, God described the world equally "very skillful" (Genesis 1:31). Some cannot take this concept of perfect harmony because of the food chain that they observe in today's world. Still, one cannot look at the sin-cursed world with the resultant death and struggle and employ this to reject the Genesis account of history. Everything has changed because of sin. That's why Paul describes the present cosmos as "groaning" (Romans viii:22). One must look through the Bible'south "eyes" to sympathize the world.35

Some argue that people or animals would have been hurt even in an platonic world. They contend that even before sin, Adam or an animal could have stood on small creatures or scratched himself on a branch. Now these sorts of situations are truthful of today'southward fallen world—the present world is not perfect; it is suffering from the furnishings of the Curse (Romans 8:22). I cannot expect at the Bible through the world's eyes and insist that the world before sin was just similar the world nosotros see today. We practise not know what a perfect world, continually restored and totally upheld past God's ability (Colossians 1:17; Hebrews ane:iii), would accept been like—nosotros accept never experienced perfection (merely Adam and Eve did before sin).

Nosotros practise become little glimpses from Scripture, however; in Deuteronomy eight:4, 29:v and Nehemiah 9:21, nosotros are told that when the Israelites wandered in the desert for forty years, their clothes and shoes did non wear out, nor did their feet swell. When God upholds things perfectly, wearing out or being hurt in any manner is not even an option.

Recall of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego (Daniel iii:26–27). They came out of the burn down without even the smell of smoke on them. Once again, when the Lord upholds perfectly, being hurt is not possible. In a perfect world, before sin and the Curse, God would have upheld everything, but in this cursed earth, things run down. Many commentators believe the description in Isaiah 11:six–9 of the wolf and lamb, and the lion that eats straw like an ox, is a picture show of the new earth in the future restoration (Acts 3:21) when there will be no more than curse or death (Revelation 21:one, 22:3). The animals described are living peacefully as vegetarians (this is also the clarification of the animal world before sin—Genesis 1:30). Today'southward globe has been inverse dramatically because of sin and the Curse. The present nutrient concatenation and fauna behavior (which too changed subsequently the Flood—Genesis 9:2–3) cannot be used as a ground for interpreting the Bible—the Bible explains why the world is the way it is.

In the beginning, God gave Adam and Eve dominion over the animals: "And so God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply; make full the earth and subdue it; have rule over the fish of the bounding main, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth'" (Genesis 1:28 NKJV). Looking at today's world, we are reminded of Hebrews 2:8 (NKJV): "For in that He put all in subjection under him, He left nothing that is not put under him. Only now nosotros do not yet see all things put under him." Human'south relationship with all things changed because of sin—they are non "under him" as they were originally.

Most people, including about Christians, tend to observe the world as it is today, with all its death and suffering, and so have that ascertainment to the Bible and translate it in that low-cal. Simply we are sinful, fallible human beings, observing a sin-cursed world (Romans 8:22); and thus, we need to kickoff with divine revelation, the Bible, to begin to empathise.

So how did fangs and claws come about? Dr. Henry Morris, a founding figure in the modern creation movement, states:

Whether such structures as fangs and claws were role of their original equipment, or were recessive features which simply became ascendant due to selection processes afterward, or were mutational features following the Curse, or exactly what, must await farther inquiry.36

After sin entered the globe, everything inverse. Maybe some animals started eating each other at this stage. By the time of Noah, God described what had happened this way: "And then God looked upon the earth, and indeed it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted their way on the earth" (Genesis half dozen:12 NKJV).

Also, after the Inundation, God inverse the behavior of animals. Nosotros read, "And the fearfulness of you and the dread of you shall exist on every beast of the world, on every bird of the air, on all that move on the earth, and on all the fish of the bounding main. They are given into your hand" (Genesis nine:2 NKJV). Thus, human would find it much more than hard to behave out the dominion mandate given in Genesis ane:28.

Why Practise We Observe Dinosaur Fossils?

Fossil formation requires a sudden burial. When an animal dies, it commonly gets eaten or decays until there is cypher left. To course a fossil, unique conditions are required to preserve the animal and replace it with minerals, etc.

To grade a fossil, unique weather condition are required to preserve the animal and replace it with minerals, etc.

Evolutionists once claimed that the fossil tape was formed slowly equally animals died and were gradually covered past sediment. But they have best-selling more recently that the fossil record must involve catastrophic processes.37 To form the billions of fossils worldwide, in layers sometimes kilometers thick, the organisms, past and big, must take been buried rapidly. Many evolutionists at present say the fossil record formed apace, in spurts interspersed by millions of years.

According to the Bible, as fourth dimension went on, earth became total of wickedness, and then God determined that He would send a global Flood "to destroy from under heaven all flesh in which is the breath of life" (Genesis 6:17).

God commanded Noah to build a very large gunkhole into which he would accept his family and representatives of every kind of land-abode, air-breathing beast (that God Himself would cull and send to Noah, Genesis 6:20). This must have included two of each kind of dinosaur.

How Did Dinosaurs Fit on the Ark?

Many people remember of dinosaurs as big creatures that would never have fit into the Ark.

But the average size of a dinosaur, based on the skeletons institute over the earth, is about the size of a large sheep or bison.38 Indeed, many dinosaurs were relatively small. For instance, Struthiomimus was the size of an ostrich, and Compsognathus was no bigger than a rooster. Just a few dinosaurs grew to extremely large sizes (e.g., Brachiosaurus and Apatosaurus), but even they were non every bit large every bit the largest animal in the globe today, the blue whale. (Reptiles have the potential to grow as long equally they live. Thus, the big dinosaurs were probably very old ones.)

It is realistic to presume that God would have sent young adults to the Ark, not fully grown creatures.

Dinosaurs laid eggs, and the biggest fossil dinosaur egg found is well-nigh the size of a football game.39 Even the largest dinosaurs were very modest when first hatched. Remember that the animals that came off the boat were to repopulate the earth. Thus, it would have been necessary to choose young adults, which would before long be in the prime of their reproductive life, to get on the Ark. Recent enquiry suggests that dinosaurs underwent rapid adolescent growth spurts.40 So it is realistic to assume that God would have sent immature adults to the Ark, non fully grown creatures.

Some might contend that the 600 or more named species of dinosaurs could non take fit on the Ark. But Genesis six:20 states that representative kinds of land animals boarded the Ark. The question so is, what is a "kind" (Hebrew: min)? Biblical creationists have pointed out that at that place can be many species descended from a kind. For example, there are many types of cats in the globe, but all cat species probably came from one or only a few kinds of cats originally.41 The cat varieties today have developed by natural and artificial choice acting on the original variation in the information (genes) of the original cats. This has produced unlike combinations and subsets of data, and thus different types of cats.

Mutations (errors in copying of the genes during reproduction) can besides contribute to the variation, but the changes caused by mutations are "downhill," causing loss of the original data.

Even speciation could occur through these processes. This speciation is not "evolution," since information technology is based on the created information already nowadays and is thus a limited, downhill process, not involving an upwards increase in complexity. Thus, merely 1 or a few feline pairs would have been needed on Noah'south Ark.

Dinosaur names accept tended to proliferate, with new names being given to but a few pieces of bone, even if the skeleton looks similar to one that is a dissimilar size or establish in a different country. At that place were probably fewer than fifty distinct groups or kinds of dinosaurs that had to be on the Ark.42

Also, information technology must be remembered that Noah'southward Ark was extremely large and quite capable of carrying the number of animals needed, including dinosaurs.

The land animals that were non on the Ark, including dinosaurs, drowned. Many were preserved in the layers formed by the Inundation—thus the millions of fossils. Presumably, many of the dinosaur fossils were buried at this time, around 4,500 years agone. Also, after the Inundation, there would have been considerable catastrophism, including such events every bit the Ice Age, resulting in some postal service-Flood formation of fossils, too.

The contorted shapes of these animals preserved in the rocks, the massive numbers of them in fossil graveyards, their broad distribution, and some whole skeletons, all provide disarming testify that they were cached apace, testifying to massive flooding.43

Why Don't We See Dinosaurs Today?

At the cease of the Alluvion, Noah, his family, and the animals came out of the Ark (Genesis viii:15–17). The dinosaurs thus began a new life in a new world. Forth with the other animals, the dinosaurs came out to breed and repopulate the earth. They would have left the landing identify of the Ark and spread over the earth's surface. The descendants of these dinosaurs gave rise to the dragon legends.

But the globe they came out to repopulate differed from the one they knew earlier Noah's Flood. The Flood had devastated it. It was now a much more than difficult globe in which to survive.

Afterwards the Overflowing, God told Noah that from then on, the animals would fearfulness human being, and that beast flesh could be nutrient for man (Genesis ix:ane–7). Even for man, the world had become a harsher identify. To survive, the once easily obtained found diet would at present have to be supplemented by beast sources.

Both animals and man would detect their ability to survive tested to the utmost. We can see from the fossil tape, from the written history of man, and from experience over contempo centuries that many forms of life on this planet take not survived that exam.

We demand to remember that many plants and air-animate, land-dwelling animals have become extinct since the Flood—either due to man's action or competition with other species or considering of the harsher mail-Flood environment. Many groups are yet becoming extinct. Dinosaurs seem to be numbered among the extinct groups.

Why then are people so intrigued almost dinosaurs and take footling involvement in the extinction of the fern Cladophebius, for example? It'south the dinosaurs' appeal as monsters that excites and fascinates people.

Evolutionists accept capitalized on this fascination, and the earth is awash with evolutionary propaganda centered on dinosaurs. As a result, evolutionary philosophy has permeated modern thinking, even among Christians.

If you lot were to ask the zoo why they have endangered species programs, you would probably get an reply something like this: "Nosotros've lost lots of animals from this earth. Animals are becoming extinct all the time. Expect at all the animals that are gone forever. Nosotros need to act to save the animals." If you then asked, "Why are animals becoming extinct?" yous might get an respond like this: "It's obvious! People killing them, lack of food, human being destroying the environment, diseases, genetic problems, catastrophes similar floods—there are lots of reasons."

The factors that crusade extinction today . . . are the same factors that caused the dinosaurs to become extinct.

If you then asked, "Well, what happened to the dinosaurs?" the respond would probably be, "We don't know! Scientists have suggested dozens of possible reasons, but information technology's a mystery."

Maybe ane of the reasons dinosaurs are extinct is that we did not start our endangered species programs early enough. The factors that cause extinction today, which came about considering of man's sin—the Expletive, the aftermath of the Flood (a judgment), etc.—are the same factors that caused the dinosaurs to become extinct.

Are Dinosaurs Really Extinct?

One cannot testify an organism is extinct without having knowledge of every part of the earth'south surface simultaneously. Experts have been embarrassed when, later on having alleged animals extinct, they were discovered live and well. For case, in the 1990s explorers institute elephants in Nepal that accept many features of mammoths.44

Scientists in Australia found some living copse that they thought had become extinct with the dinosaurs. One scientist said, "It was similar finding a 'alive dinosaur.'"45 When scientists find animals or plants that they idea were extinct long agone, they phone call them "living fossils." There are hundreds of living fossils, a big embarrassment for those who believe in millions of years of globe history.

Explorers and natives in Africa have reported sighting dinosaur-similar creatures, even in the twentieth century.46 These have ordinarily been confined to out-of-the-way places such equally lakes deep in the Congo jungles. Descriptions certainly fit those of dinosaurs.47

Cave paintings by native Americans seem to depict a dinosaur.48 Scientists accept the mammoth drawings in the cave, so why not the dinosaur drawings? Evolutionary indoctrination that human did not live at the same time as dinosaurs stops most scientists from even considering that the drawings are of dinosaurs.

Information technology certainly would be no embarrassment to a creationist if someone discovered a dinosaur living in a jungle. Notwithstanding, this should embarrass evolutionists.

And no, we cannot clone a dinosaur, as in the motion picture Jurassic Park, even if we had dinosaur DNA. We would also need a living female dinosaur. Scientists have institute that to clone an animal they need an egg of a living female, since "mechanism" in the cytoplasm of her egg is necessary for the new creature to develop.49

Birdosaurs?

Many evolutionists do not actually think dinosaurs are extinct anyway. In 1997, at the entrance to the bird exhibit at the zoo in Cincinnati, Ohio, we read the following on a sign:

Dinosaurs went extinct millions of years agone—or did they? No, birds are essentially modernistic short-tailed feathered dinosaurs.

In the mid-1960s, Dr. John Ostrom from Yale Academy began to popularize the idea that dinosaurs evolved into birds.l However, non all evolutionists concord with this. "Information technology's simply a fantasy of theirs," says Alan Feduccia, an ornithologist at the University of Northward Carolina at Chapel Hill, and a leading critic of the dino-to-bird theory. "They then much want to see living dinosaurs that now they think they can study them vicariously at the lawn bird feeder."51

There have been many attempts to indoctrinate the public to believe that modern birds are really dinosaurs. Time magazine, on April 26, 1993, had a front-page comprehend of a "birdosaur," now chosen Mononykus, with feathers (a supposed transitional form between dinosaurs and birds) based on a fossil find that had no feathers.52 In the same month, Scientific discipline News had an article suggesting this animal was a earthworks creature more like a mole.53

In 1996, newspapers reported a notice in China of a reptile fossil that supposedly had feathers.54 Some of the media reports claimed that, if information technology were confirmed, information technology would be "irrefutable prove that today'due south birds evolved from dinosaurs." One scientist stated, "You can't come to any conclusion other than that they're feathers."55 However, in 1997 the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia sent 4 leading scientists to investigate this detect. They concluded that they were non feathers. The media report stated, concerning i of the scientists, "He said he saw 'pilus-like' structures—non hairs—that could take supported a frill, or crest, like those on iguanas."56

No sooner had this report appeared than another media study claimed that xx fragments of basic of a reptile found in South America showed that dinosaurs were related to birds.57

Birds are warm-blooded and reptiles are cold-blooded, but evolutionists who believe dinosaurs evolved into birds would like to encounter dinosaurs every bit warm-blooded to back up their theory. But Dr. Larry Martin, of the University of Kansas, opposes this idea:

Contempo research has shown the microscopic structure of dinosaur basic was "feature of cold-blooded animals," Martin said. "Then nosotros're back to common cold-blooded dinosaurs."58

Sadly, the secular media have become so breathy in their anti-Christian stand up and pro-evolutionary propaganda that they are assuming enough to make such ridiculous statements equally, "Parrots and hummingbirds are besides dinosaurs."59

Several more than recent reports have fueled the bird/dinosaur contend among evolutionists. One concerns inquiry on the embryonic origins of the "fingers" of birds and dinosaurs, showing that birds could non take evolved from dinosaurs.60 A report of the so-called feathered dinosaur from China revealed that the dinosaur had a distinctively reptilian lung and diaphragm, which is distinctly different from the avian lung.61 Another report said that the frayed edges that some thought to be "feathers" on the Chinese fossil are similar to the collagen fibers found immediately beneath the pare of sea snakes.62

There is no credible evidence that dinosaurs evolved into birds.63 Dinosaurs accept e'er been dinosaurs and birds have e'er been birds.

There is no credible prove that dinosaurs evolved into birds.

What if a dinosaur fossil was establish with feathers on it? Would that prove that birds evolved from dinosaurs? No, a duck has a duck bill and webbed feet, equally does a platypus, but nobody believes that this proves that platypuses evolved from ducks. The belief that reptiles or dinosarus evolved into birds requires reptilian scales on the way to becoming feathers, that is, transitional scales, non fully formed feathers. A dinosaur-like fossil with feathers would merely be another curious mosaic, like the platypus, and part of the pattern of similarities placed in creatures to show the paw of the 1 truthful Creator God who made everything.64

Why Does It Matter?

If they don't believe the history in the Bible, why would anyone trust its moral aspects and message of salvation?

Although dinosaurs are fascinating, some readers may say, "Why are dinosaurs such a big bargain? Surely there are many more important issues to bargain with in today'due south world, such as abortion, family unit breakdown, racism, promiscuity, dishonesty, homosexual behavior, euthanasia, suicide, lawlessness, pornography, and so on. In fact, we should be telling people near the gospel of Jesus Christ, not worrying near side issues like dinosaurs."

Really, the evolutionary teachings on dinosaurs that pervade society do have a great begetting on why many will not listen to the gospel, and thus why social issues abound today. If they don't believe the history in the Bible, why would anyone trust its moral aspects and message of salvation?

If nosotros take the evolutionary teachings on dinosaurs, so we must accept that the Bible's account of history is false. If the Bible is wrong in this area, then information technology is not the Word of God and we tin can ignore everything else it says that we find inconvenient.

If everything made itself through natural processes—without God—then God does not ain us and has no correct to tell u.s. how to live. In fact, God does not really exist in this way of thinking, so at that place is no absolute ground for morality. Without God, anything goes—concepts of right and incorrect are simply a matter of opinion. And without a ground for morality, at that place is no such matter as sin. And no sin ways that there is no need to fright God's judgment and no need for the Savior, Jesus Christ. The history in the Bible is vital for properly understanding why i needs to take Jesus Christ.

Millions of Years and the Gospel

The teaching that dinosaurs lived and died millions of years earlier man directly attacks the foundations of the gospel in some other way. The fossil record, of which dinosaurs class a role, documents death, illness, suffering, cruelty, and brutality. It is a very ugly record. Assuasive for millions of years in the fossil layers ways accepting death, bloodshed, disease, and suffering earlier Adam's sin.

Simply the Bible makes it clear that death, bloodshed, disease, and suffering are a consequence of sin. Every bit function of the Curse, God told Adam in Genesis 3:19 that he would render to the grit from which he was made, showing that the sentence of death was not only spiritual simply physical as well.

After Adam disobeyed God, the Lord clothed Adam and Eve with "coats of skins" (Genesis 3:21). To do this He must have killed and shed the blood of at least one animal. The reason for this can be summed up by Hebrews 9:22 (NKJV):

And according to the law well-nigh all things are purified with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission.

God required the shedding of blood for the forgiveness of sins. What happened in the Garden of Eden was a flick of what was to come in Jesus Christ, who shed His blood on the Cross as "the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world" (John 1:29).

If the shedding of claret occurred before sin, equally would accept happened if the garden was sitting on a fossil record of expressionless things millions of years one-time, then the foundation of the Atonement would be destroyed.

If the shedding of blood occurred before sin, as would have happened if the garden was sitting on a fossil record of dead things millions of years old, then the foundation of the Amende would be destroyed.

This big motion-picture show besides fits with Romans 8, which says that the whole cosmos "groans" because of the effects of the Fall of Adam—information technology was not "groaning" with death and suffering before Adam sinned. Jesus Christ suffered physical expiry and shed His blood because death was the penalty for sin. Paul discusses this in detail in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15.

Revelation chapters 21 and 22 brand information technology articulate that there will exist a "new heaven and a new earth" ane day where there will be "no more death" and "no more than curse"—but every bit it was before sin inverse everything. Obviously, if in that location are going to be animals in the new earth, they will non die or eat each other or eat the redeemed people.

Thus, the pedagogy of millions of years of death, illness, and suffering before Adam sinned is a direct attack on the foundation of the message of the Cantankerous.

Conclusion

If we accept God's Word, beginning with Genesis, as existence true and authoritative, then we tin explicate dinosaurs and make sense of the evidence nosotros observe in the earth around us. In doing this, nosotros are helping people meet that Genesis is absolutely trustworthy, logically defensible, and what it claims to exist—the true account of the history of the universe and mankind. And what one believes concerning the book of Genesis will ultimately make up one's mind what one believes about the rest of the Bible. This, in turn, will affect how a person views himself or herself, fellow man beings, and what life is all about, including their demand for salvation.

Source: https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/when-did-dinosaurs-live/what-really-happened-to-the-dinosaurs/

Posted by: harnishfaillims90.blogspot.com

Share this post